Do Bank Holding Companies I I Act as “ Sources of Strength ” for Their Bank Subsidiaries ?

نویسنده

  • Alton Gilbert
چکیده

HOSE WHO WISH to determine why banks fail typically focus on the characteristics of banks and their local markets that make them vulnerable to losses.1 A key factor often overlooked, however, is capital injections by shareholders. A bank whose losses exceed its capital need not fail, if its shareholders (existing or new) inject sufficient additional funds to restore its capital ratio to a level acceptable to the bank’s supervisory agency. Likewise, the shareholders of a bank with a positive, but relatively low, capital ratio can always remove it from its “problem bank” status by injecting sufficient capital.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Are Bank Holding Companies a Source of Strength to Their Banking Subsidiaries?

I present evidence that the cross-guarantee authority granted to the FDIC by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 has unexpectedly strengthened the Federal Reserve's source-of-strength doctrine. In particular, I find that a bank affiliated with a multi-bank holding company is significantly safer than either a stand-alone bank or a bank affiliated with a one-b...

متن کامل

Interstate Banking, Branching, Organization Size, and Market Rivalry

The 1994 Reigle-Neal Act gave multistate bank holding companies the option to convert to an interstate branch bank structure by authorizing the merger of bank subsidiaries across state lines. Over the following five year period, an increasing number of banking companies, including a number of very large ones, have done so. As a result, large companies operating through interstate branches have ...

متن کامل

Are Bank Holding Companies a Source of Strength to their Subsidiaries? New Evidence on the Operation of Internal Capital Markets

A bank affiliated with a multi-bank holding company (MBHC) is significantly safer than either a stand-alone bank or a bank affiliated with a one-bank holding company. Not only does affiliation reduce the probability of future financial distress, but distressed affiliated banks are more likely to receive capital injections and recover more quickly than other banks. Interestingly, the effect of a...

متن کامل

Trust Revenue of Commercial Banks: The Influence of Bank Holding Companies

IN ADMINISTERING the Bank Holding Company Act, the Federal Reserve Board weighs the public benefits from proposed acquisitions by bank holding companies (hereafter called BHCs) against possible adverse competitive effects.~BHCs are asked to discuss public benefits of proposed acquisitions in applications to acquire banks and noubanking firms. A public benefit commonly mentioned in applications ...

متن کامل

The Securities Activities of the Foreign Subsidiaries of U.S. Banks: Evidence on Risks and Returns

Abstract: This study provides new evidence of the risks and returns associated with bank involvement in securities activities. This empirical evidence is drawn from an extensive analysis of the performance of the foreign securities subsidiaries of U.S. banking companies over the relatively lengthy 1987-1996 time period. Both industryand firm-level estimates of securities risks and returns from ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003